![]() You can also right-click on a folder of bookmarks and select "Open all in tabs". You can do this by right-clicking a tab and selecting "Bookmark all tabs". I'd recommend looking into tab groups to help organize so you can work more effectively (even apart from RAM issues) as well as bookmarking groups of tabs. If you don't access them, it won't load them. Firefox doesn't load existing tabs until you access them, so even if you had 80 tabs loaded from your last session, Firefox isn't loading them until you access them. You can easily have dozens of tabs loaded without hitting the memory limit (unless you have an absurd amount of inefficient extensions, as you may), but that doesn't mean you're not getting in the way of your own work. Extensions can add quite a bit of weight in terms of both RAM and CPU to each page load, so you're likely slowing down your browser experience quite a bit.Īs for tabs, it's likely you're working a bit inefficiently, even apart from RAM issues, so you might want to rethink the way you organize. I'd highly recommend going through your extensions and removing ones you don't need as well as finding other extensions that may replace the work of multiple others. Hitting a 2GB limit in your browser is a bit of a seriously extreme use case. Once Firefox is available as 64-bit, we may do a dual mode version of it at some point. Pale Moon is likely buggier than Waterfox since it's based on the older ESR branch which has had less 64-bit work. Waterfox and Pale Moon just take the existing code and compile it as 64-bit, bugs and all. So, Dear John, could you please make a portable edition of that? Thank you.įirefox's 64-bit builds aren't yet stable, which is why they're only available as Nightly and Beta. Update: I've just noticed that Mozilla had made 64-bit beta build available. ![]() paf.exe format package, so in this case, can I simply move my old profile for standard firefox portable to the profile folder of Waterfox portable? ![]() Alternative options seem to be Pale moon or Waterfox, and looks like Waterfox has a standard. Is there any method to avoid this memory leak, or is there any stable 64-bit build of Firefox portable? There is only a 64-bit nightly build officially here, but I don't want to upgrade my browser everyday. It is quite annoying because I had to kill the process frequently and resume my work every time. In this case, the whole browser window will be completely blank without showing anything and CPU usage will blow up. But in the recent several months, I do have too many tabs opened, so it is quite easy to make firefox.exe to occupy more than 2.4GB memory. I was happy with the standard Firefox portable (stable release, currently 37.0.1), and I have been using more than 70 extensions in my current profile which can be traced back to 2008.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |